Proof of Concept
Resolve the critical technical or operating question before committing to production.
Match the engagement to the decision in front of you.
- 01
A critical privacy, performance, integration or operating assumption remains unproven.
- 02
Decision-makers need inspectable evidence before approving a production programme.
- 03
The target architecture needs testing against a real institutional workflow and environment.
- Product owner
- Architecture and engineering
- Security
- Operations
- Control owners
Validate the hardest question, not a generic demo
Every PoC begins with a falsifiable question and an evidence plan. Scope stays narrow enough to produce a useful production decision.
- 01
Set the question and boundary
Define the workflow, environment, integrations, participants and assumption being tested.
- 02
Agree success criteria
Specify functional, control, performance and operating evidence before implementation begins.
- 03
Implement and observe
Build the controlled path, exercise failure modes and preserve attributable test evidence.
- 04
Make the production recommendation
State what was proven, what remains unresolved and whether to proceed, revise or stop.
A tangible basis for the next institutional decision.
Gateway designs focused proofs of concept around real institutional requirements, including privacy, identity, interoperability, migration, settlement and infrastructure performance.
- 01PoC scope and test architecture
- 02Named success and failure criteria
- 03Controlled implementation
- 04Technical and operating evidence pack
- 05Risk and assumption register
- 06Production recommendation
The critical question has an evidence-backed answer and the institution can make an explicit production, redesign or stop decision.
Proof designed around a real decision.
Existing Gateway records retain their named, anonymized and pilot boundaries. No result is presented as a general benchmark.
Differentiated visibility for a market operator
Organisation- and role-aware privacy policy at the institutional RPC boundary.
Read the evidence →PilotParticipant privacy across a settlement consortium
Per-participant visibility with an auditable operator view.
Read the evidence →PilotPrivate state with supervisory access
Deny-by-default oversight and approved disclosure for post-trade workflows.
Read the evidence →A controlled implementation with explicit success criteria, technical evidence and a recommendation for the path to production.
Exit criteria: The critical question has an evidence-backed answer and the institution can make an explicit production, redesign or stop decision.