Gateway technology
Network infrastructure, blockchain deployment, privacy and data access, selected around the financial workflow.
Gateway supplies the technology and support included in its agreement.
Explore Sovereign LedgerB2Gateway OrchestrationYour financial product.
Your financial product.
One coordinated delivery.
Bring blockchain infrastructure, specialist services and your existing systems into one delivery plan. Gateway coordinates the technical work; your institution retains product governance and authority.
J7How it works
Without orchestration, you coordinate every piece.
Each provider, integration and handoff becomes your team’s job.
| On your own | With Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Coordination | A separate workstream for every vendor | One coordinated delivery |
| Integration | Your team wires each piece together | Gateway brings the pieces together |
| Handoffs | Between every provider, owned by you | One delivery plan across providers |
| Outcome | Individual components | Your financial application |
Your financial product. Orchestrated.
Selected capabilities. One coordinated delivery.
Illustrative workflows, not pre-packaged deployments. Components, providers and responsibilities are scoped for each engagement.
S4Scope & responsibility
One architecture. Clear responsibilities.
Orchestration is the delivery model across technology, providers and integration—not another standalone blockchain product.
Specialist services
Identity, custody, signing, fiat rails and liquidity where the workflow requires specialist capability.
Each provider retains its contracted and, where applicable, regulated responsibilities.
Review the ecosystemIntegration & operations
Connections to core systems, identity and monitoring, with testing, rollout and operating responsibilities defined together.
Gateway coordinates the integration and operating scope agreed for the deployment.
Explore delivery servicesV9Working evidence · demonstration
Follow a bank requirement through the whole system.
Gateway’s tokenized-deposit demonstration connects a simulated bank estate, identity controls, Open Privacy Suite and a private ledger. The orchestration carries instructions across those boundaries.
Explore the RFP demonstrationControls you can inspect
- Funds blocked in the core before issuance.
- Two approvals tied to bank staff identities.
- Per-contract authorisation and scoped supervisory disclosure.
- Partial redemption to the current holder.
Demonstration, not a production customer deployment. The bank estate is a clean-room simulation; customer identity and the underlying RFP remain confidential.
N3For architecture, risk & procurement teams
Make the decision about the whole system.
Use these questions to frame an RFP, an architecture review or a focused proof of concept. Evidence and acceptance criteria are agreed for your scope—not assumed from a component list.
Who can act, approve and change the system?
Define authority over issuance, keys, policy, administration and upgrades, including the limits of vendor access.
Evidence to agreeResponsibility matrix, approval paths and access-control tests.
Who can see which information?
Map participant privacy, operator visibility, supervisory access and disclosure against your data and jurisdictional requirements.
Evidence to agreeVisibility matrix, disclosure workflow and negative-access tests.
How does it connect to the existing estate?
Identify core banking, ledgers, identity, messaging and provider interfaces, including reconciliation and exception handling.
Evidence to agreeIntegration map and end-to-end tests across named system boundaries.
What makes the financial workflow complete?
Specify the asset and cash legs, settlement dependencies, redemption or transfer rules, and what happens when an instruction fails.
Evidence to agreeWorkflow model, settlement assumptions and success and failure criteria.
What happens when a component fails?
Agree service levels, monitoring, recovery objectives, escalation and support ownership before production commitments.
Evidence to agreeOperating model and a recovery and resilience test plan.
What is included—and what is the exit path?
Record licence, integration and operating costs, deployment location, change control, data export and provider replacement dependencies.
Evidence to agreeItemised scope, commercial assumptions and a transition plan.
G5A staged engagement
Start with the requirement. Advance on evidence.
You do not need to select the whole stack to begin. Establish the architecture, test the critical assumptions, then agree the production scope.
Define the architecture
Turn the financial requirement into a target architecture, control boundary and integration map.
OutputArchitecture and operating model
Review this stageValidate the critical path
Test the assumptions that could block the programme, with explicit success and failure criteria.
OutputEvidence and a production recommendation
Review this stagePlan the production rollout
Agree implementation scope, readiness checks and operational handover before moving to live service.
OutputA scoped launch and operating plan
Review this stage
Ecosystem context
Specialist capability is selected for the requirement.
Existing provider relationships are inputs to the architecture. Compatibility, availability, responsibilities and commercial scope are validated for each deployment.
- Financial use cases & institutional researchEthSystems
- Insurance & riskBreach Insurance
- Liquidity & marketsFinchTrade
- Digital capital-market infrastructureAxiology
- Regional market access & ecosystem developmentTEIZA
These ecosystem examples do not imply certification, endorsement, exclusivity or participation in a particular deployment.
Bring the requirement.
Let’s define the delivery.
Start with your financial workflow, jurisdiction, existing systems and the decision you need to make. We can then scope the architecture work and evidence needed to move forward.